33 . Const. P. 114/2025 (S.B.) Mst. Zoya and another V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi Additionally, the main objectives of the police should be to apprehend offenders, look into crimes, and prosecute them before the Courts, also to prevent the commission of crime, and above all, ensure law and order to protect citizens' lives and property. The legislation enjoins the police being scrupulously fair for the offender plus the Magistracy is to guarantee a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Deviations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the regulation and order situation have been the topic of adverse comments from this Court and from other Courts, Nonetheless they have failed to have any corrective effect on it.
Official database for searching and viewing federal court dockets and case documents. Little fees use.
Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Const. P. 5/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Nasira Khalique Thr. Ms. Seema Khalique V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi CITATION:2025 SHC KHI 46 SHC Citation: SHC-252218 Tag:I have heard the uncovered counsel to the parties and perused the record with their assistance. I intentionally not making any detail comments because the issues of the matter between the parties pending adjudication before the concerned court with regard for the interim relief application in terms of Section 7(one) on the Illegal Dispossession Act 2005 handy over possession on the subjected premises into the petitioner; that Illegal Dispossession Case needs for being decided with the competent court after hearing the parties if pending given that the petitioner has already sought a similar prayer while in the Illegal Dispossession case and so far as the restoration of possession of concerned the trial court has to see this element for interim custody of the topic premises If your petitioner was found forcibly evicted from the premises in question if she possessed the valid rent agreement and decision be made within two weeks from the date of receipt of this order.
The ruling with the first court created case law that must be followed by other courts right until or Unless of course both new regulation is created, or possibly a higher court rules differently.
2299 of 2025. The findings are pending finalization and will be submitted without delay. In addition they stated that directives for strict compliance have been issued to all Karachi models, with non-compliance facing departmental action. Furthermore, they submitted that an existing enquiry is underway. Therefore, They are really directed to complete the proceedings and submit the enquiry report to this court through MIT-II of this Court. 12. This petition stands disposed of in the above mentioned terms. Read more
For that foregoing reasons the moment suit is dismissed with no order as to cost. Office to prepare decree in the above terms. Read more
27 . Const. P. 4002/2011 (D.B.) Ibrahim Noor V/S Pakistan International Airways Corporation & Ors. Sindh High Court, Karachi Even, if a petitioner was acquitted in a very criminal case following a conviction, in NAB Reference No. 20/2011, this does not automatically produce exoneration from departmental charges based within the same factual grounds. Although a writ under Article 199 is out there in specific limited situations, it really is generally not the right remedy to contest a dismissal from service based on these charges, particularly when the employee was afforded a full possibility to cross-analyze witnesses and present his/her defense but didn't convince the department of his/her innocence.
168 . H.C.A 203/2016 (D.B.) Saleh Muhammad V/S Faqir Muhammad & others Sindh High Court, Karachi Subject matter: Appeal At times it really is effortless for the Judge to dismiss the suit for non-prosecution, however, a Judge is under the obligation to make an attempt to get rid of a case on advantage and more importantly when after recording of evidence it has achieved to a stage of final arguments, endeavors should be made for benefit disposal when it's got achieved this kind of stage. Read more
, which is Latin for “stand by decided matters.” This means that a court will be bound to rule in accordance with a previously made ruling around the same kind of case.
Binding Precedent – A rule or principle proven by a court, which other courts are obligated to stick to.
In other circumstances as discussed supra pensionary benefits cannot be stopped on account of criminal charges after the retirement of two years; and, is violative from the law laid down via the Supreme Court in the case of Haji Muhammad Ismail Memon, PLD 2007 SC 35. Thus, the competent authority of the parent department in the petitioner plus the Chief Secretary, Sindh, are liable to release the pensionary amount on the petitioner and pay back the pension amount and other ancillary benefits towards the petitioner to which He's entitled under the regulation within two months from the date of here receipt of this order. The competent authority of your respondent can be directed to recalculate the pensionary benefits on the petitioner and increases accrued thereon the withheld pensionary benefits with effect from stopping to date. Read more
Statutory laws are those created by legislative bodies, for instance Congress at both the federal and state levels. Whilst this variety of legislation strives to condition our society, offering rules and guidelines, it would be unachievable for just about any legislative body to anticipate all situations and legal issues.
Because of their position between the two main systems of legislation, these types of legal systems are sometimes referred to as mixed systems of regulation.
States also commonly have courts that tackle only a specific subset of legal matters, such as family law and probate. Case law, also known as precedent or common law, would be the body of prior judicial decisions that guide judges deciding issues before them. Depending about the relationship between the deciding court plus the precedent, case legislation could possibly be binding or merely persuasive. For example, a decision because of the U.S. Court of Appeals with the Fifth Circuit is binding on all federal district courts within the Fifth Circuit, but a court sitting down in California (whether a federal or state court) will not be strictly bound to Keep to the Fifth Circuit’s prior decision. Similarly, a decision by a person district court in Big apple is not really binding on another district court, but the first court’s reasoning may help guide the second court in reaching its decision. Decisions by the U.S. Supreme Court are binding on all federal and state courts. Read more